LQD , Investment grade corporate bond ETF, Feb 2010.

Bonds are assumed to be the safe part of the portfolio, however we tend to forget that, just using a few examples, on the morning of Oct 19 ,1987, Government bonds in the US moved 22 full points in an hour or two, enough to wipe out good number of participants. It did almost immediately retrace half of that. We also tend to forget that both Enron in the US and Confederation Life here in Canada were AAA corporate entities the very morning they failed.

Bond trading has two main components, one is duration risk and the other credit risk. It may seem tough to guess where interest rates are going but it is a lot easier than guessing where an individual credit might go, which is perhaps why the individual bond trader tends to stay with the Government bonds. It is on the retail side that arguments are made why corporate bonds are a good buy. Here is the chart;

LQD

Notice that both RSI and MACD (not shown) are already negative and have been for sometime. Notice also that the lows occurred at the time of the Lehman problems back in October and did not coincide with the stock market lows in March of last year. This rally is now approaching 1 and 1/2 year. From an EW perspective the entire rally could be an a-b-c irregular correction (not shown), or a last 5 waves up to complete a 32 years bond rally to zero. In the latter case a small triangle could be forming allowing for one more push to about 107 (see the pink pattern). I doubt it. In terms of buying low and selling high, this definitely does not fit the bill.

FXI and FXP, XinhuaChina 25 ETF, and the Ultrashort, both iShares.

Earlier I suggested the Shanghai index (DJSH index ) might be ready for a substantial drop. So far it did drop but not that much. Here is the FXI which is 46% banks which may presently be more to the point as , after all it is the banks that are lending as if there is no tomorrow, even if they are doing it on command. The FXP is the equivalent short, ultra short (3x) which may be a good hedge for any commodity position. here are the charts.

 FXI Feb 2010fxp feb 2010

The FXP looks a little like the heart beat of a patient that did not make it, but then it comes from $200 not that long ago , so evidently there is some potential here.

BTE.UN, Baytex Energy Trust, Feb 2010

Energy companies come in all sizes and shapes. Some are vertically integrated and large like Shell and Exxon, some are small and very specialized in their particular field. Others are mostly in the business of finding gas and again others in the business of finding oil ( the two go hand in hand only to a certain degree). Some are “service” companies such as Schlumberger or Precision Drilling and again others are more or less utilities delivering the stuff to the consumer, like Enbridge. Consequently they all behave differently but in the main all have lost about 5-10% of their value since oil came of the $86 or so level a few weeks ago – EXCEPT this one, Baytex (and Enbridge). Not sure why that is exactly but it is a sell here or on the next dollar up, as it will double top like IVN above. This is not a certainty but it does happen too often to ignore and I have yet to meet the guy that lost money taking profits.

BTE.UN feb 2010

IVN, Ivanhoe, Feb 2010

The stock dropped some $5 right on schedule. Since then it has rebounded and should soon go for the second leg down as a minimum. About $11 would be an ideal initial target. This may come about partly as a result of what is going on with copper itself. Here is the chart.

ivn feb 2010