OTC, Open Text

otc jan 26 2014

This one looked pretty ripe at the $70 level. Here we are $40 to $50 higher, all in just a year and a bit. This is now a sell in our opinion. Friday it traded in the opposite direction to the market, going up about 10%. A number of things contributed to the gain, most importantly the announcement after the close on Thursday of a 2 for 1 stock split. The extra share will be paid as a dividend which is tax efficient for a lot of investors. Feb 7 is the date of record for this event so you have another week or two to figure out if a dividend is preferable to capital gains in your individual case. The stock is trading at a 40x p/e multiple and the RSI is above 80%, but most importantly the stock is climbing vertically. We have no idea what enterprise information management systems are but we suspect that they behave much like that double-dekker plane that falls back into its own exhaust fumes once the momentum is lost. The logical target is about $50, after the split that is $25.

Natgas, HNU update

See our post of April 18, 2012,  under Natgas, HNU and Gas. The last one we could not find anymore, it is the Claymore ETF but the two others will suffice. Here are today’s charts;

Natgas jan 24 2014HNU jan 24 2014

There may well be a lot more to go, but we do not like the speed at which things have gone up recently and also we do not like the DJ Titans Gas 30 index. So we recommend stepping aside. On both you have easily doubled your money in just under two years, which, using the rule of 72 amounts to a return of 36%, compounded per annum. Note that the RSI and the MACD are not confirming the higher prices. Also, on the futures, there is a fairly large premium on the front (spot) contracts but that quickly turns around when you go out further in time (backwardation) all of which points to lower, not higher prices in the future.

FXY, Japanese Yen

fxy b jan 24 2014fxy s jan 24 2014

We have done only a few bits and pieces of analysis on currencies despite half a career spent precisely on that. The reason is simple that it is not clear that EW should work.  As the reader certainly knows by now under EW 5 waves is up and 3 waves is down. This works just fine if you work with absolute values, not if you work with relative values. 5 waves down in New York also has to be 5 waves up in Tokyo, not 3, so it cannot possible work. Nevertheless some patterns do show up in FX frequently, in this case a triangle in the Yen (against US dollar). Triangles always occur in the 4th wave position and therefore they are a clear warning that things will turn around.

At about 130 to 127 Abeconomics comes in vogue in Japan. It is announced with a great deal of fanfare so the markets accepts the direction (yen down) with almost total certainty. So every bank, hedge fund, very rich individual etc. and his or her brother borrows the stuff by the truckload and then leverages it 2 to 60 times and buys US treasuries or other Government paper. This takes very little capital as even the banks get near zero haircuts for Govies. So if you are wondering who the idiot was that bought  10 –year US Gov. Bonds at a yield of 1.6% a year ago, here is your answer, and it is not that idiotic either. The Yen has gone from 130 to 94, most of it in the last year and a half, almost guaranteed!! The more the better.  But at year end things changed and now things look like they are running in the opposite direction. Our target for the yen, given the triangle, is 104 which, from 94, is a colossal move that has the potential of affecting everything that was bought on the other side of the trade. The turmoil in the markets for the past few days may just be like a picnic in the park once the “carry-trade” starts to unravel in a serious way. Thank you central bankers all over the World for making all this possible. Beggar-your-neighbour policies are now back in full force, Canada and its dollar are excellent examples despite the fact that the Canadian Central Bank does not have a mandate to pulverize it’s currency.

LULU update

Then and now charts;

lll nov 18 2011lulu jan 19 2014

LLL seems to have disappeared so the two charts are not entirely comparable. Nevertheless the gist of the argument was that Lululemon  was a sell almost two years ago. It did not pan out perfectly as the stock stayed in suspension for that entire time, on average, right around the $68 mark. Frustrating, but arguable the correct call.

This has to go lower, as indicated then, $42 would be a minimum and around $30 very likely if not even lower. Presently we are probable in wave 3 of C, so a rebound for wave 4 could occur at any time. Care should be taken when trying to play that move as it is not clear what degree this wave 4 might be, that is 4 of 3 of C or 4 of C.

To remain bullish, the stock should not drop below about $30 as that would cause overlap, at least in the larger count presented in the chart.