So this should be it. A slight throw-over but otherwise perfect. Yield is close to 6.75%
Year: 2015
DUCA update
When I started my computer this morning one of the first things that popped up was the above advertisement. ZenBanx is the majority owned subsidiary of Duca , the Dutch/Canadian credit union. This new enterprise is going to give them growth, lets take a look.
To keep the math simple lets assume that the exchange rate is .80 or 1.25, which would imply that it would cost 250 x 1.25 = C$312 but as they promise to do this at par they receive only C$250 so they lose C$62. But they do charge about C$6 per transaction, so on a net basis they will go in the hole C$56 for each and every transaction. This is on top of the millions squandered to get the whole thing going.
The question now is, is this an absolutely brilliant marketing ploy that is going to grab the attention of the world at a relatively low cost, or is this a completely stupid and irresponsible idea that is going to help bring Duca to it’s knees. Time will tell but I would not bet my Duca bonus shares.
RDS.B update, $56 should be it.
We have two counts. In black a simple 5 wave sequence for wave 1. There are 1-2s and 4-5s in it but that is all At $56 the sequence would be complete. In red a first zig-zag A-B-C in which wave C is equal to A at $56. A rebound to perhaps as high as $74 would be next in both cases and then either wave 3 starts or a second zig-zag.
We have waited a long time for all this to develop and here we are, all that is left to do is buy at $56 plus a little.
Canadian Banks.
So now that we have a prototype how does this fit with the Canadian Banks? First a bit more about B-waves. They can be regular, or irregular which simple means that they climb above the starting point of the A wave. Their are no hard and fast rules but I believe it is more or less accepted that irregular B-waves should not exceed the top of the A-wave by more than about 30 t0 35%. Here is an example, CWB, Canadian Western Bank, they pride themselves on financing anything that is yellow (think CAT) and belches diesel smoke;
You can clearly see the B-wave. This one just happens to be at the edge of the 30 to 35% or so limit, but in every other respect it is perfectly clear. Target $8 or lower. If that sounds ridiculous than keep in mind that it last traded there just 10 years ago.
An error crept into the chart, the 4th of previous degree line should be lower, at $6!
The next two big banks that have the clearest B-waves are CIBC, CM and BMO;
Commerce is of particular interest as it managed to double top, the last big bank to do so much to the surprise of many that work there and thought they would never see the day. In any event, nice B-waves and terrible targets. BNS and National Bank have B-waves that are borderline but still acceptable given the channels they are in;
Royal appears to follow the triangle scenario a little better and TD is unclear, perhaps because the Canada Trust part changed the company to such an extent that it simple cannot be looked at on a continues basis;
Royal sticks to it’s channel quite nicely. It would fit either of the two scenarios equally well, in fact it probably fallows the path of JP Morgan the best despite the fact that it has outperformed it by a long shot. TD must fall into the B-wave scenario given the otherwise not acceptable overlap. Putting it all together, including the insurance companies we have the XFN, the TSX capped financial ETF;
There can be no question that this is a B-wave, AND that it is complete. This chart has less time on it as the ETF did not exist prior to 2002. Fortunately, we can still see where the wave 4 of previous degree, that is on the way up, is. $11 and that is where we should go under EW rules and guidelines.
We have left out HCG, Home Capital Group. It is by far the best performer and fundamentally runs a sound business model. It does not fit easily in either scenario but with a little imagination we can make the triangle – distorted though it may seem to be – work quite well. The top is even perfectly above the apex! Here is that chart;
The conclusion must be that you do not want to be in the financials, period. By the way, this negative outlook is in no way predicated on what happens in Greece. If the timing seems to coincide it would be just another one of those fallacies, after this, therefore because of this.