IVN, Ivanhoe

There are 10 previous blogs on this company. Last time in Jan.2011 the expectation was that the stock could drop quite a bit to around $13 from the $30 level where it had peaked. Here is that chart;

ivn 2011 1

$13 was the most extreme as it was entirely possible that the drop would stop at the trend-line at $17.50 at that time if the drop was steep. It was not but it did get to that level. Today this is what we have;

ivn aug 2011 ivn aug 2011 s

So it did not  as deep as expected but it did trace out a very, very, nice “expanding diagonal triangle” wave C with the A and B in front of it. This is a highly reliable formation that calls for a sharp move back up to at least the origin of $30. A drop below $16 or so would negate this entire scenario.

Just the other day this company made the claim that it could mine its copper at a negative cost, that is the by-products (gold etc.) fetched enough to pay for the operation. This stock is out of phase with the rest of the space and it is huge.

The Fed.

We all know that the Fed. was created in the middle of a dark night off the coast of the Carolinas in 1913 or so. It is not a government agency as just about everyone wants to believe. It is more a quasi partnership between banks of different nationalities to save the world, after saving themselves.

The market, supposedly is looking forward to whatever rabbit will be pulled out of the hat at Friday’s Jackson Hole conference. Last time it was QE2, might it be QE3 this time ? Apparently it is not yet abundantly clear to the vast majority that “pushing on a string” or bringing the proverbial horse to water does not matter if the beast does not want to play ball. Even so hope is eternal and the market seems to know that there will be a rabbit, no matter how small.

In the mean time the San Francisco Fed (there are 12 of these) did a research study that was pretty well ignored, at least the impact was less visible than the earthquake. Here is that study in short;

fed populat 2  fed populat 1

They, the research guys at the SF Fed found a correlation between age and investment behavior. Nothing new, we had that here with Foot and others already. But here is the point, they expect with a high degree a statistical credibility ( a lovely 61% correlation for Fibo  believers) in support of their conclusion that stocks should trade at a P/E of about 8 or so in 5 to 10 years. We are at 14 now so the Fed is telling you stocks might drop by 1/2. So much for QE3 or the next rabbit.

The M/O ratio is the fraction of people between 60 and 69 that own most stocks and are about to retire. More at the website SFFRB.

ACN, Accenture Ltd.

acn l acn s

Accenture, like all or most, is on its way down. A reasonable first target would be around $36 or so. Short term it is possible to count 5-waves down (black) in which case we should get an immediate bounce. More in line with the rest of the market would be the blue count at about $43. We will keep an eye on it.

CNQ, Canadian National Resources.

cnq b cnq m

CNQ is like so many others, except a little clearer even. You have to look at the chart and then it is not that difficult to conclude that , if this stock were actually to regress to the mean, it could easily make it to $10 . In fact, it is not far-fetched at all as regressing to the mean is as normal as the sun rising in the morning.

In EW terms it gets pretty compelling. The rally after the lows of March is ,without a doubt, an A-B-C shown in a stylized way to make the point. It has given back almost 40% of its value and about 60% of the rally. It may go a little lower just to get to the B-wave level but should get a solid bounce soon (decent here means almost $10). Then the regression will continue! A sell at $41 if it gets there!