At $75,10 this stock is right on target, actually 10 cents above that but then it did not stay there either. All this is happening as a result of another bid for the company by Carl Icahn. It is now a sell. If you have a broker that charges you a fortune like 2.5%, then it sometimes makes sense simple to tender the stock into the bid at the appropriate time and circumvent paying these commissions. If the transaction costs are not too relevant one should normally sell as from here on there is only downside risk in the event the deal falls through. This has happened with increasing frequency.
G , Goldcorp
ABX has not moved an inch over the past ten years or so. Goldcorp has gained about $8 over the past 6 years, that is 17% absolute, and about 3% per annum compounded over those years (about the same as a ten year government bond!).This during a period that was generally recognized as the Great Recession and the end of the existing banking system as we had known it to that point. This is exactly what these stocks are supposed to protect you against but I know of a number of investors that were pretty well wiped out by G. Here are the charts;
Gold itself is trading close to $1600 US, that is nice but way short of the $2600 or so to keep you inflation protected (since 1980). So the simple fact that these stocks are not moving – and Goldcorp is one of the better ones – may be telling us that inflation is not around the corner, instead we should expect serious deflation.
Had one assumed, erroneously but understandable, that the top at 3 was the top, the double top line drawn in green through that point would have warned an investor to think twice. This line is touched or crossed about ten times only to have the stock fall back below it. If that is not a good warning I do not know what is. Also over the last 3 years there have been a number of cases of overlap, see more detailed chart below;
Overlap, with one exception, does not occur in bull market sequences. The exception is the “diagonal” or wedge which must be either a 5th wave or a C wave. In this case only the C wave makes any sense at all which then leads to the conclusion that the entire move up from the March ‘09 lows is a correction that is about to end. $56 is the maximum! And, of course at the present $52 level we are , once again, double topping. Time to get out.
Concerning deflation I have attempted earlier to explain that the “monetary” dogma as furthered by Keynes etc. is theoretically and pragmatically unsound and perhaps little more than rubbish, but it is mainstream and therein lies the problem.( A similar situation exists with the Efficient Market Theory, thoroughly discredited by those in the know and adored by those that are in the dark). If you think about it, the single most important input factor over the ages has been labor, not commodities, energy or any of those. The world is awash with under-employed and un–employed people. New entrants into the global workforce are showing up everywhere by the billions. Modern production methods also make things a lot easier. You do not need a 20 year apprenticeship anymore to grind out a camshaft on your own. All you need to be able to do is read, that is enter the coordinates into the machine, throw in a blank and switch it on. The machine will do the rest to tighter tolerances than ever before, in less time and without sick days. This “transformation” is also entering into areas outside of manufacturing such as the legal , medical and brokerage businesses. So it is amazing that nobody seems to think that deflation is a real possibility.
As a hedge, gold and gold stocks are practically useless despite the deeply entrenched myth to the contrary. In the main gold moves up when stocks move up and vice versa. This is only normal considering that they are both primarily real assets. In the event of deflation, both will go down.
KGI, Kirkland Lake Gold, update.
Here are the two charts, then (May 17) and now;
Despite last week’s comments we would sell here. The simple reason is that the triagle can be interpreted in two ways (green and red). The green and original one was more compact and allowed for a higher thrust. Both the green and red interpretations are close to being complete. We like “the-bird-in-the-hand” approach so we are happy to take the profit $17.50-$13.90 = $3.60 or about 26%.
Fundamentally we do not like the fact that Mr. Bernanke has, at last, acknowledged that his QEs could actually have had an impact on commodity prices. With that, he has effectively painted himself in a corner.
In any case, this stock should drop back to the base of the triangle so there is no good reason to stick around.
CL update and IBM
Colgate, as discussed before looks like it is topping in a 5th wave wedge. This it has in common with IBM;
Whereas CL has a contracting diagonal (wedge) IBM has an expanding one. IBM when we still knew what business it was in, experienced a 25 year period during which the stock traded down. That 25 year pattern could possible be a “megaphone” which would , by necessity make it a wave 4. Even then the stock is topping;
Typically the stock does not trade much above the upper boundary of the “megaphone”, which is about where the stock is now. A sell however you slice it.