Kirkland Lake Gold

KGI dec 13 2012

We made a good trade with this stock more than a year ago. Then we recommended getting out conservatively at $18 (see previous blogs). The stock peaked $3 higher but for the most time has gone down nicely. The other day it lowered guidance. Also it has “cash” cost (the equivalent of variable costs, I guess), of $1253 per ounce. If other costs are included little is left at todays gold price.

Presently 2 different counts present themselves. The one in black is the simplest and would suggest the drop is complete. The purple one needs a substantial rebound before dropping lower (the lows in Nov. of 2008 were close to $1). Ergo, in both cases a nice bounce should develop  with a reasonable expectation that at the very least the gap should be closed. A buy with a stop at, say , $4.

KGI, Kirkland Lake Gold, update.

Here are the two charts, then  (May 17) and now;

kgi may 17, 2011  kgi jul 2011 2

Despite last week’s comments we would sell here. The simple reason is that the triagle can be interpreted in two ways (green and red). The green and original one was more compact and allowed for a higher thrust. Both the green and red interpretations are close to being complete. We like “the-bird-in-the-hand” approach so we are happy to take the profit $17.50-$13.90 = $3.60 or about 26%.

Fundamentally we do not like the fact that Mr. Bernanke has, at last, acknowledged that his QEs could actually have had an impact on commodity prices. With that, he has effectively painted himself in a corner.

In any case, this stock should drop back to the base of the triangle so there is no good reason to stick around.

KGI, Kirkland Lake Gold, update

Here is the May 17th chart as a refresher;

kgi s

The target was tentatively and conservatively set at $18 (triangle mouth measurement and trend-line). This target does not take into account any rise due to the lapse of time. Here is where we are now;

kgi jul 2011

We got to $16.45 so there is more to go. Often, but not always, the stock peaks right above the apex of the triangle, that would allow for more time. Also the trend-line ( one point is rather precarious!) is at around $19. The triangle’s mouth measurement would put the top at about $18.50.  Your choice!

kgi b

Get out with a 30% gain when the target is reached. The stock should drop back to the base of the triangle, and depending which scenario holds (blue or red, and possible – not shown- a large wedge wave 5, but there is no overlap.) it could be game over for quite a while.

KGI , Kirkland Lake Gold. Kinross warrants.

 kgi l kgi s

Being rather agnostic about the entire gold sector I try to be as objective as possible. Here is a stock that may well go up over the next few months. RSI and MACD are both positive and the stock appears to have traced out a nice triangle which could  be in the 4th wave position. If correct the stock should rise to about $17/$18.On a log-scale the A and C legs would be about equal, each having tripled more or less. Triangles can also be in B-wave positions and therefore a stop-loss should be used (at about $13)

 

 

kwtc compared kwtd compared

One of my faithful readers mentioned that there is also a warrant d on Kinross which might be a better buy than the c warrant as it has a longer term to expiry. I would agree that the longer life of the warrant improves the chances of getting a positive result. However this is a personal inclination and not necessarily a mathematically correct one. As with options generally you get what you pay for (not really) and the price at all strikes and expiry dates should properly reflect the risk/reward aspects. Short options can be done repeatedly for the price of a longer one. Similarly many out-of–the-money options can be bought for the same price as a deep in-the-money one. The choice is mostly a matter of preference.

I would prefer the d warrant as well but would never have seen the rather perfect “wedge” that is so visible on the c. You can buy 2x as many c warrants as d warrants and should the stock climb back to where it was last October the c would triple (from 1 to 3) whereas the d would grow by only 2.5x (from 2 to 5), all this assuming all other things being equal which they are not.