CNQ, Can. Nat. Resources update

 

CNQ feb 21 2014

See previous blogs- some things we got right , most we didn’t. What stands out is the B-wave. In EW terms that could imply that we are presently in a large C wave down that is taking its time. This is shown in blue. We are already going up vertically and we are close to a “logical” upper trend line level of roughly $44. The stock is trading at a p/e >20x (compared to about 13x for XOM or RDS) and technical indicators are getting overbought. On the bullish side, (we do not believe it!) the stock could be tracing out a large triangle wave 4, with A,B,C and D complete and E still to go. Ultimately this bullish scenario should take the stock to the vicinity of $60+. Again, we do not believe it but, for the moment that is not relevant us under both scenarios the next move is down almost $15 or 30%. To put things in a historical perspective, this company had a capitalization of $1 million in 1989, compared to the $40 billion now, so it has been a stellar performer. We would sell here or use a close trailing stop-loss.

CP and CNR

cp dec 2012 bcp dec 2012 s

We have been completely wrong on both CP and CNR (see under CNR). Both have behaved like runaway trains far exceeding our expectations. CP is now trading at a p/e close to 24 and a yield of about 1.5% The new boss has just announced his plans to get the operating ratio down another 10 points, the recipe is the usual one, fire a quarter of the workforce and announce it just before X-mas. Just like in that famous movie that is always played over and over around this time -  the new boss even fits in well – , this may ultimately backfire. Even the analyst at RBCDS is looking for a double digit drop. The scary part is that this situation demonstrates clearly to what extent a hedge fund can actively muscle its way into the running of a company, perhaps a good thing at certain times, perhaps not when it is a little overdone. This is a sell on the next bounce.

CP, Canadian Pacific and CNR

See our previous blog of July 2nd. We got CNR just about right, a month too early and a couple of dollars too low , but it has already dropped quite nicely. Not so with CP which is at least $10 higher than we expected so here is the update;

cp oct 24 2012

Enthusiasm for Mr. Hunter Harrison’s talents is unlimited. The 67 year old rainmaker is quickly solidifying his reputation gained at CNR as a train-maker. Profits were up 20% with the top line up 8%, most gains stem from cost cutting. Accordingly the operating ratio went down from 75.8 to 74.1 , all though some detractors point out that the storms that played havoc last year did not occur this time. The stock has doubled in a year and we think that is enough for the moment, actually way too much. With a p/e close to 25 (CNR is more like 14) the stock is grossly overvalued.

In EW terms the stock appears to have completed, or will complete, a text-book flat in which the A-B-C has three legs approximately the same size. The subdivision are nicely balanced and symmetric. Next stop is $35/$30 if this scenario proves to be correct. Sell on the open or use a tight stop-loss.

CP, Canadian Pacific Railway and CNR, Canadian National Railway

CP jul 2012 lcnr jul 2012 l

The charts do not have the same time frame! CNR is the larger of the two and the only one with East to West and North to South capabilities. Up to 1995 it was a crown corporation. But it is CP that has adopted the beaver as the animal to emulate for its smarts, engineering capabilities and enormous level of energy, in short all those things that Canadians have in abundance. But  in the opinion of one Mr. Ackman of Pershing Square, a hedge fund, the company has very little of those attributes. So after a few years of yanking at its chain he has managed to crown the ex-CEO of CNR as the new CEO of CP, a fellow by the name of Hunter Harrison , a 67 year old no nonsense American from the South. All this is interesting simple because it is so un-Canadian, otherwise we will not comment on the merits of all this.

However, looking at the charts and adjusting for the time difference, the performance is not that dramatically different as both start between $10 and $20 and move up to $80 to $90. The operating ratio was the tricky part, at which  the beaver consistently underperformed. Lots of excuses from snow to no-snow, from bulk goods to normal freight etc. etc. failed to explain that and ultimately a change at the top  was the only solution. Unfortunately that  will probable do absolutely nothing for the shareholders. CP (see a previous blog) probable topped out months ago while CNR is also ready for a big correction. CP completed a B-wave while all this was happening and CNR a 5th wave. Both could lose about $50 in the next few years. In detail;

cp jul 2012 scnr jul 2012 s

CP had a nice run-up  as all this was going on and perhaps all the good things coming from this, supposing there are some, are already discounted in the stock. This one looks like it will turn out to be a buy on rumour, sell on fact situation regardless of whether or not there will be a fact other than this recent CEO appointment.

By the way, if you look closely at the channel drawn in the big Yahoo chart of CP, you will notice that the above expectation would be fulfilled just by regression (reversion) to the mean – often referred to as the surest rule in the stock market – , at about the mid-point of that channel. Nothing really to write home about.