FVI, Fortuna.

 

fvi2011

This stock is fascinating in so much that it lost 1/4 of its value right on target, but then it came right back and actually exceeded its previous high of about $4.75. This, I think, is an irregular b-wave; irregular in that it went a little higher but is still classified as part of a bearish structure. The wedge leading the stock into its top has a truncated (5) wave within the wedge which, combined with the irregular b-wave promises a fairly violent downturn from here.Notice that both the RSI and MACD are turning down for quite some time now.

Silver itself is also displaying some clear signs of fatigue, this at a level that is rather precisely 61.8% of the highs ($55) during the Hunt brothers failed market cornering operation back in 1981.See chart of SLV below;

slv2011

ABX, G, FVI gold stocks big and small

abx jan 20 2011 g jan20 2011

Both these large cap. gold stocks developed rising wedges/flags, pennants, contracting triangles in EW speak or whatever you want to call it. More often than not these structures are erased in their entirety.Roughly that would take ABX down to $36 and G to $35. That is not all of it as, depending on how we get there, 3-waves as shown in the ABX chart, or 5-waves as in the G chart, these stocks COULD drop a lot further. Notice that on both these stocks the RSI and MACD were ringing the proverbial bell on the floor. Goldcorp rang the bell even louder having failed 5 times to rise measurable above it’s previous peak.

Small gold stocks have not done much better recently, see for instance ZJG which is a sort of small cap.index. Recently, November last year, right at the top, we pointed to FVI for the simple reason that it is called Fortuna and all though we do not speak Spanish ,we suspect that it translates , more or less as fortune. Of course it does not say which one – the one you are going to make or the one you are going to lose. Here is the (short-term) chart;

FVI jan 2011

We are trying to keep an open mind with regard to the count. The one used above is by no means the only one possible so we concede that it,and the conclusions drawn from it, may be dead wrong. On the other hand there are a few good reasons to assume it might be correct. For one thing , the upper-trend line is respected perfectly by each and every high in the stock, of which there are five or six. Also the 5th wave, which is the extended one, is pretty close to being equal to waves 1 to 3 combined, again a common occurrence, especially where commodities and/or commodity based stocks  are concerned. Furthermore the RSI and MACD started rolling over about half a year ago. If correct $2,50/ $2,00 are consistent with this count, which if you own it from the highs would mean the loss of , at least, half your fortune.

ABX, FVI, Fortuna.

ABX is a reasonable proxy for gold being the largest producer and, only recently, being totally un-hedged . Here are a few charts;

abx nov 2010 2 ABX nov 2010

I am very agnostic about all the arguments that are doing the rounds that gold can only go up. For 15 years or so this stock has made no progress whatsoever. Even after doing away with its hedge programme, a change that really sounded more silly than ever at the time, hardly a budge for this largest gold miner. Looks very much like a wedge, that is for the c part of an a-b-c correction. These sometimes go on longer than one could reasonable anticipate, but since we are pretty close to double-topping , my guess is that it is game over.  It is actually quite a non confirmation between the ‘stuff” and the stock. From the lows in 2001 , or so , this stock has gained about 150%+ in value, the stuff  itself is going up by 5 to 6 x.

Some silver stocks, poor man’s gold, equally suggest a little caution. Here is one out of many.

FVI nov 2010

Nice 5 waves, maybe?