Housing in Toronto, no bubble.

The Toronto Star is not generally admired for it’s business section, which, by the way, is often combined with the sports section. That tells you where the priorities are. Nevertheless, if you happen to live in the country this is the only paper available, and, on occasions they do come up with some real gems. Craig Desson’s contribution today is one of those gems. For 3 or 4 homes he went back to the 1915 (precisely a century ago!) offerings, compared those with what the Bank of Canada thinks is the inflation adjusted value today, and then compares that with the most recent sale price for that property. Here are two examples;

housing in TorontoHousing in Toronto 2

Assuming the math is correct houses went up in price, on average for these two, 20.52X as the result of inflation. Put in other words, you have lost a little more than 90% of the value of your money in 100 years. But, over and above that, houses are now 8X more valuable than they should be on an inflation adjusted basis alone.

It should be patently clear from these numbers that there is no reason whatsoever to think that there might be a bubble in Toronto!

Housing

Housing long term

No Canadian long term charts that I could find, but presumable we did pretty much what they did in the US. We do know that in 1912 (the year of the Titanic) a house in the Annex (a suburb of Toronto) cost $6900. That same house today would easily fetch about $800,000. That is roughly the same as in the US chart, roughly 100x. The TSX went from 500 to 16000 or 32x. Not a fair comparison to be sure. A house costs money to own and stocks for the most part pay dividends. Of course in the US owning a house can earn you a substantial tax deduction, not in Canada. But then any capital gains in Canada are tax free, at least on the principal residence. Not so in the States, but then the “deductibles” are so high that nobody pays anyway.

In the period from 1974 to 1978 you could have bought a very nice house in Toronto for about $100,000 when the TSX was at 1000. That house is worth about $1.2 mln. today and the TSX 14000.  Roughly 12x against 14x. One dividend paying and the other tax-free. Very scientifically speaking, that is the same and it should be. Both are real assets and should have tripled simple on account of lower interest rates. And tripled again on account of inflation that our governments insist does not exist. That more or less explains it all. Should stocks go down as a result of higher interest rates and/or lower inflation (deflation) the real estate values will follow in tandem and, no doubt, catch everyone by surprise. In Japan they already know what can happen;

housing japan

From peak to trough (?) they are down 70+ % in the big cities where the majority lives.

Housing, again

The Toronto Star carried an article about housing from Capital Economics, precisely along the same lines as I have talked about before. I am sure they will not mind my using one or two of their charts.

housing 2011feb Housing 2011 feb2

On the left a comparison is made of house prices in relationship to family income. (it is not clear always what that is, his & hers; before or after tax etc.) .Typically since thee stone ages that ratio runs at about 3x, according to the chart 3.5X on average. We are at 5.5 x, almost 60% higher then the norm. To get back to the norm they argue that our market needs to drop 25%, but to get back to the average (regression to the mean) a drop of 40% is needed and that does not take into account the usual overshoot.

Country properties, hobby farms and other such properties can be hurt a lot more. From 1989 to say 1996 some properties North of Highway 7 (the edge of the Earth for Torontonians then), dropped 50–60% easily and some commercial properties 70-80%.

housing 2011

According to the Toronto real Estate Board chart (the annotations are mine) prices rose pretty evenly (staying in narrow channel) but also quite rapidly over the past 10 years. Roughly from $200,000 to $400,000 which equates to an annual compounded return of 15%. Notice the throw-over in late 2009. That may just be it for a while. None of this, of course,we are told by the central Banks, has anything to do with variable mortgage rates close to 2%!

HCG,Home Capital Group (housing market in Canada)

hcg june 2010

The above long term chart is of Home Capital Group, a company that came into existence sometime in the mid eighties. The company has grown in leaps and bounds and presently has a balance sheet just shy of $8bln or so. Its goal in life is not to compete with the big boys but to wait for the crumbs to fall of the table. By being innovative and actually making credit assessments they have thrived  and have done so in harmony with the big banks ( who themselves were not allowed to do mortgages until the end of the eighties) The big Canadian banks, in contrast to HCG, prefer not to make a serious credit assessment, preferring to throw their immense weight around and asking for, and getting, a lien on your first born, the right of offset wherever that may be available and a variety of other securities. Oddly enough, when you do go a little “sub prime” so to speak, you can actually end up with a better security by way of the , required, backing of the CMHC (Can. Mort. and Housing Corp. ala Fannie and Freddie) Interestingly HCG is the only (publicly traded financial institution) that I can think of that actually made new highs by a fairly substantial margin; a feat not even the cream of the crop, the Royal was able to do.

Looking at the chart through a EW pair of glasses I tentatively conclude that the most recent high was the end of a 5th wave and not a B wave as in most other stocks. If so a fairly large drop is in store for the company, which , by the way, is not a reflection of their management but simple because that is the way it is given the macro-economic forces bearing down on mortgages.

This brings me to the point I would like to make. We all know that the Maestro could not see a bubble if his life depended on it. I was therefore pleasantly surprised to see that Businessweek (now Bloomberg Businessweek) was able to suggest that we actually might have a bubble in the Vancouver area. I travelled there in 1986 and noticed that there were some nice properties on the island that could be had for $250.000 or so. Now a shack will put you down a million+. The article explains that the most favored instrument is a letter of assignment sold by developers. Something like an unregulated futures market and all of this in Canada! Perhaps things are a tad overdone and things will get a little more difficult, HCG certainly suggest that this may indeed be the case!